13 ms·
The COVID situation and the very unusual lockins and lockouts are irrelevant to this topic, as stamp or not, she would still have not been allowed back into the
by z9znz 4y ago
The COVID situation and the very unusual lockins and lockouts are irrelevant to this topic, as stamp or not, she would still have not been allowed back into the US during that period (unless she had full US citizenship).
And my point is that the logistic issues about stamps are a side issue, with the real issue being the [mis|over]use of H1-B in the first place.
This also isn't just a US issue. Many (probably most) countries have fixed duration visas and will not allow you to just casually return if your visa has expired. You have to plan ahead to ensure you have renewed your visa before leaving (and even to avoid overstaying). Now if you have an automatic tourist visa which kicks in, that can provide some safety; but in some cases some countries will disallow conversion of tourist visa into any other kind of visa without leaving the country and applying. There are vast variations and combinations depending on the details of country-country.
> hold hostage current H-1B holders
I don't understand why people seem to believe that once you have a temporary right, you should be able to have that right forever after. I live abroad, and I have to go through the process and expense to renew my visa to live and work there. If circumstances change in that country, they certainly have the right to tighten up requirements to the point where I would not be allowed to renew. This it not an issue of where a renewal stamp is given.
- bmitc 4y agoThe situation is perfectly relevant, just its scale is larger than other incidences. The U.S. makes visa holders return to their own country to renew the stamp because in the case of denial, the U.S. can just wash their hands of the visa holder. Also, I think you’re continuing to conflate the actual H-1B visa with the stamp. You can’t get a stamp unless you have a valid visa. My wife’s H-1B was still valid and active at the time, only her stamp had expired. There are also discrepancies between how long the stamps last. Chinese stamps only last a year, whereas others countries’ last longer. You are also incorrect about her traveling back in this instance. If her passport wasn’t held hostage by the U.S. Consulate awaiting a new stamp, she could have traveled back to the U.S. prior to the ban took effect. Even if she missed that, the U.S. Consulate held her, foreign issued mind you, passport, preventing travel to Canada on a valid visa. The entire point is that this entire stamp process has these secondary and tertiary effects, seemingly by design, that are disconnected from the actual visas and act as an additional layer of complexity and increases the surface area for arbitrary denial separate form the actual visa process. The visa and the stamp are two different things.