3 ms·
If it were that easy, why aren’t they doing that?
by cycrutchfield 4y ago
If it were that easy, why aren’t they doing that?
- the_third_wave 4y agoI can't speak for these people but I do know why this happens in Sweden (where I live): because the Swedish state provides lavish benefits, a lot more than neighbouring countries. This fact is taken by human smugglers, blown out of all proportions where they promise migrants that they'll get a house and a car and a girlfriend (not a joke) if only they pay them €€€€ to be dumped into a leaky boat across the Mediterranean.
- thehappypm 4y agoBecause they arent seeking asylum! They want jobs.
- cycrutchfield 4y agoSorry, I wasn't precise enough with my language. I was saying if it is that easy to determine who has a legitimate asylum claim, then why don't the courts do so?
- coryrc 4y agoWhen they actually show up to court, they're usually not granted asylum. But we have teens of millions of people living here illegally, it's not hard to avoid the authorities.
- thehappypm 4y agoThis is exactly what I’ve been saying. Many migrants don’t even show up to their asylum hearings.. they just use it as a deportation delayer. You’d think 100% of migrants would show up if they were serious but its only like 80%.
- cycrutchfield 4y agoFor some reason we keep talking past one another. I’m talking about why CBP doesn’t just turn away asylum seekers that transit via Mexico if it is so easy to determine in advance that their asylum claims are not legitimate. For some reason you keep railing against illegal immigrants instead of actually engaging in productive discussion.
- thehappypm 4y agoCBP is not authorized to do so. Asylum must go before a judge.