That doesn't counter the point above. France's fleet was built in the 70s, at difference costs. And what were those costs? Were they viable at the time, or was

That doesn't counter the point above. France's fleet was built in the 70s, at difference costs. And what were those costs? Were they viable at the time, or was it a government program that would spend at any cost? Are today's costs viable now? Have you bothered to look at Flamanville or Olkiluoto? What happened when in the past when France built subsequent copies of a reactor design, and won't we expect similar costs rises with these already unviable reactors?