3 ms·
Is our ultimate goal to get nuclear at any cost? Then sure. But nuclear at any cost is not a reasonable goal. The only reason we want nuclear is for its carbon
by epistasis 4y ago
Is our ultimate goal to get nuclear at any cost? Then sure.
But nuclear at any cost is not a reasonable goal. The only reason we want nuclear is for its carbon-free energy. At which point it must be evaluated on its merits, not as an end goal of its own
- donmaq 4y agoAnd how can we just ignore the waste problem? [1] In many cases, containment pools are full to the brim with spent rods [2], which is both environmentally hazardous, & a target for terrorists (dirty bombs) 1: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/nuclear-waste https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/nuclear-waste 2: https://ips-dc.org/spent_nuclear_fuel_pools_in_the_us_reducing_the_deadly_risks_of_storage/ https://ips-dc.org/spent_nuclear_fuel_pools_in_the_us_reduci...
- pfdietz 4y agoWe can ignore the waste problem because nuclear fails even if we do so.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoThe waste problem is real, and if the nuclear shills can demonstrate that there can exist a nuclear reactor that can compete with solar+storage in winter at 45 degrees north economically then we can bother talking about it. Until then we dismiss them along with every other technology that does not meaningfully exist.