3 ms·
It has this to say about WikiLeaks: "WikiLeaks is a repository of primary source documents leaked by anonymous sources. No consensus exists on its reliability.
by Beltalowda 4y ago
It has this to say about WikiLeaks:
"WikiLeaks is a repository of primary source documents leaked by anonymous sources. No consensus exists on its reliability. Some editors questioned the applicability of reliability ratings to Wikileaks. Some editors believe that documents from WikiLeaks fail the verifiability policy, because WikiLeaks does not adequately authenticate them, and there are concerns regarding whether the documents are genuine or tampered. It may be appropriate to cite a document from WikiLeaks as a primary source, but only if it is discussed by a reliable source. However, linking to material that violates copyright is prohibited by WP:COPYLINK."
Which seems reasonable to me.
- mc32 4y agoThat's fine... but when has their material proven false in practice any more than what WP deem reliable sources?