3 ms·

> This should have been Iraq 2.0. You mean 3.0 I assume... Anyway, that seems like an awful idea to me. Russia is still nuclear armed and if you try to atta

> This should have been Iraq 2.0. You mean 3.0 I assume... Anyway, that seems like an awful idea to me. Russia is still nuclear armed and if you try to attack Russia hard and fast, as America did to Iraq twice, there is a chance they would respond with nuclear force. Better to keep the war at a relatively low intensity and bleed Russia dead slowly, so that at no point does Russian leadership experience existential panic. Boil the frog^W bear slow so he doesn't jump out of the pot.

roenxi 4y ago
You want to purposefully destabilise the government of a country with the largest nuclear arsenal? Are you crazy!? That is the worst strategy I've ever heard, and it is also insane. That is literally a plan to see a new Hitler, but with with nukes. Iraq 2.0 as in Russia plays the role of the US and Ukraine plays the role of Iraq.