4 ms·
Part of the charm of Smalltalk (or, more objectively, the uniqueness in a Perlis-language sense) is its image-based nature. Smalltalk is the image. A Smalltal
by fractallyte 15y ago
Part of the charm of Smalltalk (or, more objectively, the uniqueness in a Perlis-language sense) is its image-based nature. Smalltalk is the image.
A Smalltalk IDE is unlike any other. The integration of language and 'operating system' changes the way you look at most other languages; it's not just an OO thing. You lose all that if you go running to the familiar, comfortable 'standard' of a text editor.
Personally, I'd suggest Pharo Smalltalk as an ideal starting point: it's clean, modern and under vigorous development, with a thriving community.
Also, I strongly disagree with 'unwieldy class libraries' - I've found the libraries a joy to use. Clear, logical, and very easy to explore even without reams of documentation.
- wrp 15y agoI think this is taking the position that even though the semantics of the language is the same, changing the interface to it can make for a change in programming paradigm. I'm skeptical, but it would be interesting to hear this idea developed more.