3 ms·
I think this may be because this is the first generation in human history to have endless distraction in our pockets, so that's become our "escape of least resi
by smeej 4y ago
I think this may be because this is the first generation in human history to have endless distraction in our pockets, so that's become our "escape of least resistance." Any time we feel overwhelmed, we turn to diversion and distraction.
Pre-world-wide-web-in-your-pocket, what were your options when you needed a break from your regular life? There were definitely unhealthy ones, like drinking to excess, but even that often took place around other people, and it wasn't as easily available as doomscrolling. It's not half as easy to pull out your flask when you're on the train or in an elevator or standing in line at Chipotle for more than 3 minutes and become uncomfortable.
We're the first generation that never has to stand still and be uncomfortable, basically ever. If something is emotionally difficult, we can run from it.
Maybe this stunts us. Maybe it keeps us from gaining the perspective that the discomfort normally either resolves on its own, relatively quickly and in a positive way (i.e., the line quickly leads to lunch), or it inspires action, which might lead us to prove our own efficacy to ourselves when we realize we can do something to address the situation rather than just running away.
Adulthood is characterized by having the perspective that enables us to do unpleasant things in the short-term for the sake of long-term benefits. But if we continue not to need to face even the mild tedium of standing in a line without distraction, how are we ever going to convince ourselves of the benefits of doing anything we don't immediately want to do?