This makes no sense. Both sides of this interaction already seem to agree that the child should be restricted. One uses it as a justification for the sanitizin

This makes no sense. Both sides of this interaction already seem to agree that the child should be restricted. One uses it as a justification for the sanitizing of the internet and the other thinks it should be the parents job. Don't pretend to champion some sort of bigger faith in children, that was never the point of the discussion