4 ms·

One notable difference is the c-word, which is a gendered slur in the US, but not in Scotland or Australia. I'm self censoring here because this is a US-run si

One notable difference is the c-word, which is a gendered slur in the US, but not in Scotland or Australia. I'm self censoring here because this is a US-run site and I'm afraid I'll get shadowbanned if I use it in full. I am not from the US and this word does not carry the same weight for me.

Y_Y 4y ago
If I'm going to be censored for saying "cunt" I at least hope I don't have to do the censoring myself.
- tut-urut-utut 4y ago
  Only a cunt would censor you for saying "cunt". Also, I find it funny that "cunt" is considered a gendered slew in the US (according to one of the parent comments). Being a cunt has nothing to do with gender, and everything with a character.
  - thwarted 4y ago
    There's a bit that comedian Bill Burr does where he observes that referring to someone as "that fucking $XXX" is considered racist while "that $XXX motherfucker" isn't and it has to do with the former talking about the group $XXX as a whole and the latter very explicitly (uh, no pun intended) referring to an attribute of an individual.
  - fknorangesite 4y ago
    > Being a cunt has nothing to do with gender Surely you see, though, how it could.
    - itintheory 4y ago
      I see this argument as similar to the idea that 'bitch' doesn't have to do with gender. If that were true, wouldn't calling someone a 'dog' carry the same weight? Let's stick with 'asshole'.
      - hrnnnnnn 4y ago
        The truth remains that in US culture it does have this gendered meaning, and in Scottish and Australian culture it does not. Context matters. Intent matters.
        largepeepee 4y ago
        Context and intent is also the first to go in the censorship witch-hunt. Google has fired many an engineer that mentioned that.
  - TylerE 4y ago
    Why are you surprised? In US usage it refers to female genitalia. I believe the non-US equivilant is 'fanny'.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
- abathur 4y ago
  Maybe, maybe not :)
1langisbad 4y ago

Y_Y 4y ago

If I'm going to be censored for saying "cunt" I at least hope I don't have to do the censoring myself.

tut-urut-utut 4y ago
Only a cunt would censor you for saying "cunt". Also, I find it funny that "cunt" is considered a gendered slew in the US (according to one of the parent comments). Being a cunt has nothing to do with gender, and everything with a character.
- thwarted 4y ago
  There's a bit that comedian Bill Burr does where he observes that referring to someone as "that fucking $XXX" is considered racist while "that $XXX motherfucker" isn't and it has to do with the former talking about the group $XXX as a whole and the latter very explicitly (uh, no pun intended) referring to an attribute of an individual.
- fknorangesite 4y ago
  > Being a cunt has nothing to do with gender Surely you see, though, how it could.
  - itintheory 4y ago
    I see this argument as similar to the idea that 'bitch' doesn't have to do with gender. If that were true, wouldn't calling someone a 'dog' carry the same weight? Let's stick with 'asshole'.
    - hrnnnnnn 4y ago
      The truth remains that in US culture it does have this gendered meaning, and in Scottish and Australian culture it does not. Context matters. Intent matters.
      - largepeepee 4y ago
        Context and intent is also the first to go in the censorship witch-hunt. Google has fired many an engineer that mentioned that.
- TylerE 4y ago
  Why are you surprised? In US usage it refers to female genitalia. I believe the non-US equivilant is 'fanny'.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

abathur 4y ago
Maybe, maybe not :)

1langisbad 4y ago