3 ms·
The scientific method doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room. This is an open-and-shut statement that they will publish data which says what they want it to say.
by samatman 4y ago
The scientific method doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room.
This is an open-and-shut statement that they will publish data which says what they want it to say.
Or rather, that peer review will reject papers for reasons that have nothing to do with their scientific validity.
Which is the same thing. This isn't science, anymore. Everything they publish from now on must be considered useless unless replicated elsewhere.
- socialismisok 4y agoIt doesn't say that at all. It says that the scientific method is enhanced by having people with knowledge about a domain involved in the research. I am not Japanese. I'm not Finnish. I've never been to Finland or Japan. If I write an academic paper about the educational culture of these two countries, you don't think it would benefit from having a Finnish or Japanese person involved?