As much as I think the rest of what you're saying is a really good point, I do think the article has some interesting things it says as well. For example: > B

As much as I think the rest of what you're saying is a really good point, I do think the article has some interesting things it says as well. For example: > By framing the embrace of childish sensibilities purely as a moral failing, and lumping all forms of it together, critics like Sasse and Andersen miss two important points. One is that there is a nourishing form of regression that harnesses the playfulness, creativity and diversity of childhood, but there is also a destructive form that manifests as blind rage. Both forms of regression are fuelled by a certain disappointment with society. Both crave the creation of something new. But one delights in transgressing boundaries through play, while the other polices boundaries through hate and violence.