3 ms·
No, the article just starts with citing research done on babies with blue eyes. But it elaborates on that later on. For example: > Though the data is limited a
by vanderZwan 4y ago
No, the article just starts with citing research done on babies with blue eyes. But it elaborates on that later on. For example:
> Though the data is limited and has only been carried out in just one country, the US, changes in eye colour appears to be most common among people with Northern European, Pacific Islander or mixed-race heritage.
Which checks out for me personally: I'm mixed Dutch-Chinese, my Dutch father has blue eyes and my Chinese mother has dark brown eyes. My sisters and I were born with eyes so dark they looked black, almost as if we had no iris. They lightened to dark brown as we grew up.
- Markoff 4y agoyeah, right, only with blue eyes > One study led by Cassie Ludwig, an ophthalmologist at the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, tracked 148 babies born at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital in California, recording their iris colour at birth. Nearly two-thirds of babies were born with brown eyes, and one-fifth with blue. > Two years later, Ludwig and her colleagues found that of the 40 blue-eyed babies in the study, 11 had brown eyes by the age of two, three had hazel, and two had green. Of the 77 brown-eyed newborns, almost all (73) still had brown eyes at the age of two.