3 ms·

There's a difference between creating a derivative work and analyzing how something is done in order to create something new based on that knowledge. You can ma

There's a difference between creating a derivative work and analyzing how something is done in order to create something new based on that knowledge. You can make songs in style of Led Zeppelin that sound like they could be written and performed by Led Zeppelin without violating any copyrights (and to be able to do that you obviously need to know some Led Zeppelin songs beforehand), but you can't take "Dazed and Confused", change the guitar solo and part of the lyrics and call it done... Well, at least unless you end up as big as Led Zeppelin was before someone catches you, I guess ;)

jcelerier 4y ago
> Well, at least unless you end up as big as Led Zeppelin was before someone catches you, I guess ;) Are you talking about the Led Zeppelin who get entangled in judicial pursuits for plagiarism every couple years? If it was as clear cut as you say it is it would never reach any judge. There is even one case where someone was condemned for not copying any specific song but the general style of another musician : Pharrell Williams had to pay 5M to the Marvin Gaye estate because of this https://rpjlaw.com/blurred-lines-copying-songs-musical-style-enough-warrant-copyright-infringement/ https://rpjlaw.com/blurred-lines-copying-songs-musical-style... https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2018/07/blurred-lines-between-inspiration-and-infringement https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2018/07/blurred-lines-b... Yes, this is extremely shitty but this is the world we live in
- seba_dos1 4y ago
  > Are you talking about the Led Zeppelin who get entangled in judicial pursuits for plagiarism every couple years? Yes, I intentionally mentioned a song "by Page – inspired by Jake Holmes": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazed_and_Confused_(song)#Led_Zeppelin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazed_and_Confused_(song)#Led_... > The Ninth Circuit stated that the appeal was decided “on narrow grounds” and that the “decision does not give license to copyright a musical style or ‘groove.’” What a pile of bullshit. I wasn't aware of that case.

jcelerier 4y ago

> Well, at least unless you end up as big as Led Zeppelin was before someone catches you, I guess ;) Are you talking about the Led Zeppelin who get entangled in judicial pursuits for plagiarism every couple years? If it was as clear cut as you say it is it would never reach any judge. There is even one case where someone was condemned for not copying any specific song but the general style of another musician : Pharrell Williams had to pay 5M to the Marvin Gaye estate because of this https://rpjlaw.com/blurred-lines-copying-songs-musical-style-enough-warrant-copyright-infringement/ https://rpjlaw.com/blurred-lines-copying-songs-musical-style... https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2018/07/blurred-lines-between-inspiration-and-infringement https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2018/07/blurred-lines-b... Yes, this is extremely shitty but this is the world we live in

seba_dos1 4y ago
> Are you talking about the Led Zeppelin who get entangled in judicial pursuits for plagiarism every couple years? Yes, I intentionally mentioned a song "by Page – inspired by Jake Holmes": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazed_and_Confused_(song)#Led_Zeppelin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazed_and_Confused_(song)#Led_... > The Ninth Circuit stated that the appeal was decided “on narrow grounds” and that the “decision does not give license to copyright a musical style or ‘groove.’” What a pile of bullshit. I wasn't aware of that case.