> I see that you refuse to compare Android to its most realistic counterpart - Apple. Uh, what? Of course the iPhone is more profitable than Android, and I hav

> I see that you refuse to compare Android to its most realistic counterpart - Apple. Uh, what? Of course the iPhone is more profitable than Android, and I have already said so in this discussion. If you think that a product needs to reach iPhone numbers to count as successful, I really don't know what to say. But I note that you are indeed incapable of naming a single Amazon product that was as successful as Android, while still maintaining that Android was somehow a commercial disappointment, while Amazon is a success story. You really don't see the disconnect?