4 ms·
Los Angeles has “trivially” solved this. They did two things. First a large public outreach and education campaign to “don’t do that”. Second, in the areas w
by whartung 4y ago
Los Angeles has “trivially” solved this.
They did two things.
First a large public outreach and education campaign to “don’t do that”.
Second, in the areas where this commonly occurred they halted ammunition sales for, I think, a week before the event (notably New Years and 4th oh July).
I don’t even think the NRA bothered to fight that one.
At the time it had a very notable effect on the volume of gunfire before and after the program went into effect. There was telling news video doing a before and after, and the reduction was significant.
We’re any follow up studies done on the effectiveness? I have no idea. Is it still effective (the was done 30 years ago), I also have no idea. But at the time, it seemed to have some impact.
And as far as solutions go, it was pretty trivial. Fundamentalists will grouse but c’est la vie, but its scope was really limited.
- autoexec 4y agoIn the US most of the solution is going to be education, especially as we take in more and more people accustomed the practice. Really, it's not hard to turn public opinion for/against something, but it does take money and time. If we, as a culture, spent half as much time talking about gun safety and shaming people who fire indiscriminately into the sky as we do talking about "pumpkin spice" and shaming people for their natural bodies we'd be set.