6 ms·
But that's the thing. It is into anything. The method name can't be any more specific because the method isn't more specific.
by kevincox 4y ago
But that's the thing. It is into anything. The method name can't be any more specific because the method isn't more specific.
- nailer 4y agoHence not mentioning a specific type in either suggestion. The method name can be understandable without having to resort to docs, and without having to mention specific types. With the current vague name I thought string.into() would be some kind of character converter.