3 ms·
The article does put quite a lot of emphasis on "soon broken" encryption algorithms, so can't blame kebman for that comment. It only mentions what you pointed o
by yazzku 4y ago
The article does put quite a lot of emphasis on "soon broken" encryption algorithms, so can't blame kebman for that comment. It only mentions what you pointed out almost in passing.
Also not an expert here, but if "Valuable insights through AI (artificial intelligence), big data, and analytics can be extracted from data", then you'd be a fool to believe this will protect your privacy, right? Or am I missing something? I want encryption that protects me from corporations, not encryption that protects the data corporations have from us and ups their surveillance game. I guess it's no coincidence a lot of research seems to be done by M$.
- not2b 4y agoIf FHE could be made to work (and we are a long way off), the cloud provider would not be able to see your data even though you're doing processing on the data that remains on the cloud provider's CPUs, so in that sense it would protect you from Amazon/Google/Microsoft/plug in your cloud provider here.
- yazzku 4y agoThen how can they extract "insights" from the data if they can't see the data? At what point do the "insights" defeat the purpose of protecting your data from the cloud provider? Or are the claims in the article bogus?