2 ms·
> - https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA You're right. My adblocker blocked it, so I didn't spot it. What I said about j
by cxr 4y ago
> - https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA
You're right. My adblocker blocked it, so I didn't spot it. What I said about jQuery, however, is still true.
> - https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ => Plausible + jQuery
Wrong—this one doesn't use jQuery, and none of the others do, either.
- capableweb 4y agoYeah, you're right about jQuery. I got fooled because the page is loading the following URL: > https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js But the response to that request is not an actual copy of jQuery, which it seems when you just look at the URL, but the following body instead: /* NO, really, NOBODY NEEDS TO INCLUDE A FUCKING FRAMEWORK TO MAKE A COOL WEBSITE. */ console.log("Don't worry, no jQuery was used in this website."); var $ = function () { $.fancyRainbow = $; $.html = $; return $ } I got fooled by it, should have verified it was actually jQuery I guess. Now the other comment about jQuery (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599) kind of makes sense, almost.