2 ms·

You are correct, but now you are getting into shades of grey more nuanced than > Either you believe in an open internet or you don't. Either you're with us, or

• ok123456 4y ago
  The distinction is between perfectly legal speech, and specific acts fraud or things that are direct, actionable, and credible threats to physical safety (e.g., bomb threats). This isn't a complicated blah blah, where we need a technocratic meta-god to put his thumb on the scales. The existing legal pre-computer legal frameworks cover these cases.