4 ms·
This appears to be just one plank of a tripartite shock assault on the October conference season. The other two, also by anonymous authors using the same forma
by Hard_Space 4y ago
This appears to be just one plank of a tripartite shock assault on the October conference season.
The other two, also by anonymous authors using the same formatting, are:
AudioGen: Textually Guided Audio Generation
https://openreview.net/forum?id=CYK7RfcOzQ4 https://openreview.net/forum?id=CYK7RfcOzQ4
and
Re-Imagen: Retrieval-Augmented Text-to-Image Generator
https://openreview.net/forum?id=XSEBx0iSjFQ https://openreview.net/forum?id=XSEBx0iSjFQ
There is a samples site for AudioGen, but it is currently flooded and inaccessible:
https://anonymous.4open.science/w/iclr2023_samples-CB68/report.html https://anonymous.4open.science/w/iclr2023_samples-CB68/repo...
- abeppu 4y agoWhat's the commonality in formatting you're paying attention to? I think the conference asks everyone to use their template/style. But the architecture figures look like they have different styles. E.g. the Re-Imagen paper uses rows/stacks of small colored circles to represent output tensors, and colored rectangles of different ratios to indicate shape differences, where the phenaki paper uses stacks of squares for output tensors, and differently shaped elements to distinguish different kinds of components. https://github.com/ICLR/Master-Template https://github.com/ICLR/Master-Template