2 ms·
The question is not about whether they reinstated it or not. The abusive part is instead of apologizing and making up for their stupid mistake they openly state
by hdjjhhvvhga 4y ago
The question is not about whether they reinstated it or not. The abusive part is instead of apologizing and making up for their stupid mistake they openly stated they stand behind their decision and that it was the right thing to do. I haven't seen such a condescending attitude from any company in years.
- gaws 4y ago> The abusive part is instead of apologizing and making up for their stupid mistake they openly stated they stand behind their decision and that it was the right thing to do. I haven't seen such a condescending attitude from any company in years. They do not want to set a precedent. Unfortunately, the only option is to have a zero tolerance policy (regardless of outcome) that results in account closure.