>Oh gosh, you have my respect. You've gone right in with the apex challenge there; to de-bias the sam harris readership! To be clear we're not talking about pr

>Oh gosh, you have my respect. You've gone right in with the apex challenge there; to de-bias the sam harris readership! To be clear we're not talking about prejudice but rather just bias. Which is certainly interesting to why Harris biases toward men, but not really seeing the problem. There is absolutely no problem in having a bias. Everyone and everything has to figure out their target audience and more often than not you will pick your own identity group. >Worth noting as well: the authors' genders are not noted manually. From the implementation notes: So you are actively misgendering and discriminating against trans people amongst virtually everyone else. . >I have .. opinions on this (Miles-long screed in which I navigate the topic of how best we go about creating more equitable systems where previously systemic biases have held sway for so long. /... years later after we gather to read libraries of reflections on affirmative action and positive discriminations.../ we border on agreement that perhaps it's ok to counter a 95:5 bias with 5:95 and not be too perturbed :p) I guess we disagree here. You flagrantly discriminate against everyone and then introduce a completely broken biased results. The way I see it you are likely to be a bad actor here.