2 ms·
We're not talking about abused children. We're talking about children from poor homes.
by denton-scratch 4y ago
We're not talking about abused children. We're talking about children from poor homes.
- giantg2 4y agoPlease follow the context of this comment. This was about providing minimum income or otherwise providing money to parents to support their children.
- denton-scratch 4y agoThe GP was saying that if children arrive hungry for school, they're being abused by their parents; who should be arrested as criminals, and their children taken into care or adopted. Did you miss that bit of the context of the comment?
- giantg2 4y agoI don't see that anywhere. It seems you're misinterpreting, especially if you're not posting quotes. If the parents have the money (or access to programs that provide resources) and still choose to not properly feed or care for their kid, then perhaps the things you mention do fit. There's clearly case law that supports anyways.