3 ms·
It's certainly possible, yes, but it's worth considering the cost, because it adds up quickly. In England, the cost of a school lunch is about ~£2.35. In the U
by jlmorton 4y ago
It's certainly possible, yes, but it's worth considering the cost, because it adds up quickly.
In England, the cost of a school lunch is about ~£2.35. In the US, it's about ~$3.80.
When I go out to eat in the US for lunch, a typical take-away place to get something like a sandwich is maybe around $12. In the US, if we increased school lunch funding equivalent to that, the increase would be something like $8 per student per day. There are 50 million K-12 students in the US, so that would cost $400 million per day.
The per-pupil cost would be $1,472 per year. In a classroom of 20 students, that would be nearly $30,000/year -- enough to substantially increase teacher salaries, and nearly enough to pay for a teaching assistant in every classroom.
Obviously, there's nothing saying we couldn't increase funding by $1 or $2. But my point is simply that there are indeed trade-offs.
- yamtaddle 4y agoIt costs way, way less than $12/meal to deliver a healthy, quality, fixed-menu hot meal to a 100-400 people in the US. We could do it for $5/meal, maybe less. Still expensive, but not that expensive.
- jlmorton 4y agoI'm sure you're right. Maybe an easier way to describe the trade-off is to simply say every $1 spent on school lunches in the United States is about a $3,700 annual cost per classroom, and about ~$10 billion nationally.
- yamtaddle 4y agoRight, your broader point that it'd be a non-tiny expense is correct, the ballpark total was just far enough off (~double) from the highest remotely plausible figure we might conceivably spend on public school lunches that I thought it worth pointing out.