3 ms·
I can imagine that, I just don't see it. Every single time someone is complaining about this format it is a contiguous thought stream with no comments or other
by 300bps 4y ago
I can imagine that, I just don't see it. Every single time someone is complaining about this format it is a contiguous thought stream with no comments or other breaks in between for me.
Can you tell me what client you are reading this in that is showing comments in between the original content? Again, I am simply clicking on the link from OP on Windows 11 with Microsoft Edge. If I view it in Chrome it looks to be in the same identical easy-to-read format. I'm wondering what others are using that are making it so difficult.
- kemayo 4y agoTwitter tries to show the original author's thread-tweets uninterrupted. However, sometimes the thread gets broken -- generally in very long threads -- and it starts showing replies from other users rather than the next tweet in the thread. It's not happening here, so I'd assume that the person you're responding to has just had a few bad experiences trying to read threads like that in the past. (It happens with the twitter web client and app, so I'd assume it's something to do with how they build the thread server-side, rather than being something where it's meaningful to ask about the client being used.)
- xani_ 4y agoXANI @XANi Even if it is contiguous you still have very long breaks. 0 ♺ 0 ♡ 0 XANI @XANi About 40% of the space between sentences is taken by the buttons and poster name 0 ♺ 0 ♡ 0 XANI @XANi Do you really can't see the issue with it ? 0 ♺ 0 ♡ 0 XANI @XANi It's really obnoxious to read 0 ♺ 0 ♡ 0 XANI @XANi Or you're just understating those flaws on purpose ? 0 ♺ 0 ♡ 0