4 ms·

- https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA - http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ =>

- https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA - http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA - https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ => Plausible + jQuery - https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/ => No JS included So 3/4 have analytics, + one with jQuery. Tested by looking at requests made in the network inspector of the browser developer tools.

Sodman 4y ago
And the jQuery it pulls isn't even gzipped or otherwise encoded! Although at least it's minified.
vinay_ys 4y ago
Does anyone have a day-to-day use blog/site that passes all the tests like this?
- capableweb 4y ago
  I've heard news.ycombinator.com is pretty great when it comes to good readability, UX and being lightweight :)
cxr 4y ago
> - https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA You're right. My adblocker blocked it, so I didn't spot it. What I said about jQuery, however, is still true. > - https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ => Plausible + jQuery Wrong—this one doesn't use jQuery, and none of the others do, either.
- capableweb 4y ago
  Yeah, you're right about jQuery. I got fooled because the page is loading the following URL: > https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js But the response to that request is not an actual copy of jQuery, which it seems when you just look at the URL, but the following body instead: /* NO, really, NOBODY NEEDS TO INCLUDE A FUCKING FRAMEWORK TO MAKE A COOL WEBSITE. */ console.log("Don't worry, no jQuery was used in this website."); var $ = function () { $.fancyRainbow = $; $.html = $; return $ } I got fooled by it, should have verified it was actually jQuery I guess. Now the other comment about jQuery (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599) kind of makes sense, almost.

Sodman 4y ago

And the jQuery it pulls isn't even gzipped or otherwise encoded! Although at least it's minified.

vinay_ys 4y ago

Does anyone have a day-to-day use blog/site that passes all the tests like this?

capableweb 4y ago
I've heard news.ycombinator.com is pretty great when it comes to good readability, UX and being lightweight :)

cxr 4y ago

> - https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA You're right. My adblocker blocked it, so I didn't spot it. What I said about jQuery, however, is still true. > - https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ => Plausible + jQuery Wrong—this one doesn't use jQuery, and none of the others do, either.

capableweb 4y ago
Yeah, you're right about jQuery. I got fooled because the page is loading the following URL: > https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js But the response to that request is not an actual copy of jQuery, which it seems when you just look at the URL, but the following body instead: /* NO, really, NOBODY NEEDS TO INCLUDE A FUCKING FRAMEWORK TO MAKE A COOL WEBSITE. */ console.log("Don't worry, no jQuery was used in this website."); var $ = function () { $.fancyRainbow = $; $.html = $; return $ } I got fooled by it, should have verified it was actually jQuery I guess. Now the other comment about jQuery (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599) kind of makes sense, almost.