3 ms·
I'm not arguing that it's good, only that it's not as exploitative as the parent made it to be. Also, until now, the most questionable thing would be the 100 d
by gjulianm 4y ago
I'm not arguing that it's good, only that it's not as exploitative as the parent made it to be.
Also, until now, the most questionable thing would be the 100 days in a circle one, and the reward is $500k. I think most people, even if not in dire need, would happily go and do that. Here in the comments you already see examples of that.
And, most importantly, I don't see the "coercion" anywhere. Most of the people participating are subscribers to him, he's not just searching for poor people out of the street.
- citizenkeen 4y agoThe argument is that money is coercive.
- gjulianm 4y agoFollowing that line of argument, every interaction with money involved is coercive. There must be something else that defines whether there is coercion or not.