3 ms·

Ironically, all of those (except https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/) try to pull in some kind of Analytics JS, wh

Ironically, all of those (except https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/) try to pull in some kind of Analytics JS, which kind of defeats their point... One of them even pull in jQuery...

cxr 4y ago
2 out of 4 have analytics (not "all of those (except [the last one]"), and none of them use jQuery.
- capableweb 4y ago
  - https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA - http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA - https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ => Plausible + jQuery - https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/ => No JS included So 3/4 have analytics, + one with jQuery. Tested by looking at requests made in the network inspector of the browser developer tools.
  - Sodman 4y ago
    And the jQuery it pulls isn't even gzipped or otherwise encoded! Although at least it's minified.
  - vinay_ys 4y ago
    Does anyone have a day-to-day use blog/site that passes all the tests like this?
    - capableweb 4y ago
      I've heard news.ycombinator.com is pretty great when it comes to good readability, UX and being lightweight :)
  - cxr 4y ago
    > - https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA You're right. My adblocker blocked it, so I didn't spot it. What I said about jQuery, however, is still true. > - https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ => Plausible + jQuery Wrong—this one doesn't use jQuery, and none of the others do, either.
    - capableweb 4y ago
      Yeah, you're right about jQuery. I got fooled because the page is loading the following URL: > https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js But the response to that request is not an actual copy of jQuery, which it seems when you just look at the URL, but the following body instead: /* NO, really, NOBODY NEEDS TO INCLUDE A FUCKING FRAMEWORK TO MAKE A COOL WEBSITE. */ console.log("Don't worry, no jQuery was used in this website."); var $ = function () { $.fancyRainbow = $; $.html = $; return $ } I got fooled by it, should have verified it was actually jQuery I guess. Now the other comment about jQuery (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599) kind of makes sense, almost.
BrandoElFollito 4y ago
Ah, interesting. I nevera actually started DevTools on them but yes - they betrayed my trust :)

cxr 4y ago

2 out of 4 have analytics (not "all of those (except [the last one]"), and none of them use jQuery.

capableweb 4y ago
- https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA - http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA - https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ => Plausible + jQuery - https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/ => No JS included So 3/4 have analytics, + one with jQuery. Tested by looking at requests made in the network inspector of the browser developer tools.
- Sodman 4y ago
  And the jQuery it pulls isn't even gzipped or otherwise encoded! Although at least it's minified.
- vinay_ys 4y ago
  Does anyone have a day-to-day use blog/site that passes all the tests like this?
  - capableweb 4y ago
    I've heard news.ycombinator.com is pretty great when it comes to good readability, UX and being lightweight :)
- cxr 4y ago
  > - https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ => GA You're right. My adblocker blocked it, so I didn't spot it. What I said about jQuery, however, is still true. > - https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ => Plausible + jQuery Wrong—this one doesn't use jQuery, and none of the others do, either.
  - capableweb 4y ago
    Yeah, you're right about jQuery. I got fooled because the page is loading the following URL: > https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js https://thebestmotherfucking.website/js/jquery-3.5.1.min.js But the response to that request is not an actual copy of jQuery, which it seems when you just look at the URL, but the following body instead: /* NO, really, NOBODY NEEDS TO INCLUDE A FUCKING FRAMEWORK TO MAKE A COOL WEBSITE. */ console.log("Don't worry, no jQuery was used in this website."); var $ = function () { $.fancyRainbow = $; $.html = $; return $ } I got fooled by it, should have verified it was actually jQuery I guess. Now the other comment about jQuery (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33020599) kind of makes sense, almost.

BrandoElFollito 4y ago

Ah, interesting. I nevera actually started DevTools on them but yes - they betrayed my trust :)