4 ms·
That's plausible, but suggests that the creator never tested it on real-world data. Either way, it's really bad development work.
by CWuestefeld 15y ago
That's plausible, but suggests that the creator never tested it on real-world data. Either way, it's really bad development work.
- seiji 15y agoMethinks you misunderstand. This is a money-at-all-costs gambit, not a pinnacle-of-science-and-engineering product. It could have been made by someone following popular HN advice: a.) target women by b.) preying on a weakness (here, a sense of insecurity) then c.) extract money.
- scoot 15y agoI'm not so sure the advice is popular, so much as it get's repeated ad-nauseum by an individual with little else to offer.
- statictype 15y agoit get's repeated ad-nauseum by an individual with little else to offer. You've been on HN for less than an year. I'm not sure you're ready to start passing judgement on how much one of the most helpful contributors has to offer.