3 ms·

How This Tiny Motor Is More Powerful Than Your Car

2 points by peter_d_sherman 4y ago

peter_d_sherman 4y ago
Keywords: Electric Motor, Koenigsegg Quark, Raxial Flux, 335 HP, 63 Pounds, Lighter Than A Tesla Motor, etc., etc.
- metadat 4y ago
  Why is the SEO keyword stuffing necessary? Or is this intended to be a conversation starting discussion point? Cheers.
  - peter_d_sherman 4y ago
    Interesting philosophical discussion you bring up: What is Information on the Internet, and what is "SEO keyword stuffing"? ? What distinguishes Information -- from "SEO keyword stuffing"? In theory, to one view of the world -- Wikipedia, which should (ideally!) be pure information -- could also be interpreted as one giant "SEO keyword stuffing" exercise! In fact -- one could argue that everything on the Internet, everything that is text and subject to a search engine -- is in fact, equal-and-oppositely just a giant "SEO keyword stuff" !!! Now me personally, I have no intent to "SEO keyword stuff" (please define better!) -- I do have an intent to tag relevant information as relevant information. For the record, I am NOT affiliated with Konigsegg in any way shape or form -- I just like their technology, and the aspects of the technology that I highlighted in my alleged "keyword stuff" -- were NOT included in the title of the video(!) -- if they were -- then I wouldn't have needed to include them! Also, it's an amazingly bland and generic criticism ("broad and overreaching") to accuse someone of "SEO Stuffing" -- without knowing their intent! If it helps -- then I apologize (profusely!) -- for posting factually accurate information about a new, interesting, and novel invention! <g>
  - peter_d_sherman 4y ago
    In fact, let me ask you a better question (see my previous response first!)... By your nebulous, undefined, "could-apply-to-anything" use of the term "SEO keyword stuffing"... What ISN'T -- SEO keyword stuffing -- on the Internet? ? ??? In other words, please define -- what you mean -- by "SEO keyword stuffing"...?
  - peter_d_sherman 4y ago
    Also (please read my other messages first -- they were posted earlier) you know, the online service CompuServe a long time ago -- had a special section for keyword placement in its messages. In the USENET newsgroups, the last four lines of a message were, by custom, allocated for whatever keywords or tagline that a user wanted to put in, outside of the original message. And what about today's blogs with their tags? Is properly tagging information on a blog, by the blog's author -- "SEO keyword stuffing" ? ? If I have violated any HN policy, then I apologize -- but your comment seems like a very arbitrary criticism. I could have phrased the same information in my original comment above as a statement, for example: "This Electric Motor called the Koenigsegg Quark which uses Raxial Flux which has 335 HP which weighs 63 Pounds which is Lighter Than A Tesla Motor -- is really pretty cool -- or at least it is in my opinion!" Would my phrasing of my original comment that way (exact same information -- probably the exact same value to search engines) -- have appeased you? ?
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]

peter_d_sherman 4y ago

Keywords: Electric Motor, Koenigsegg Quark, Raxial Flux, 335 HP, 63 Pounds, Lighter Than A Tesla Motor, etc., etc.

metadat 4y ago
Why is the SEO keyword stuffing necessary? Or is this intended to be a conversation starting discussion point? Cheers.
- peter_d_sherman 4y ago
  Interesting philosophical discussion you bring up: What is Information on the Internet, and what is "SEO keyword stuffing"? ? What distinguishes Information -- from "SEO keyword stuffing"? In theory, to one view of the world -- Wikipedia, which should (ideally!) be pure information -- could also be interpreted as one giant "SEO keyword stuffing" exercise! In fact -- one could argue that everything on the Internet, everything that is text and subject to a search engine -- is in fact, equal-and-oppositely just a giant "SEO keyword stuff" !!! Now me personally, I have no intent to "SEO keyword stuff" (please define better!) -- I do have an intent to tag relevant information as relevant information. For the record, I am NOT affiliated with Konigsegg in any way shape or form -- I just like their technology, and the aspects of the technology that I highlighted in my alleged "keyword stuff" -- were NOT included in the title of the video(!) -- if they were -- then I wouldn't have needed to include them! Also, it's an amazingly bland and generic criticism ("broad and overreaching") to accuse someone of "SEO Stuffing" -- without knowing their intent! If it helps -- then I apologize (profusely!) -- for posting factually accurate information about a new, interesting, and novel invention! <g>
- peter_d_sherman 4y ago
  In fact, let me ask you a better question (see my previous response first!)... By your nebulous, undefined, "could-apply-to-anything" use of the term "SEO keyword stuffing"... What ISN'T -- SEO keyword stuffing -- on the Internet? ? ??? In other words, please define -- what you mean -- by "SEO keyword stuffing"...?
- peter_d_sherman 4y ago
  Also (please read my other messages first -- they were posted earlier) you know, the online service CompuServe a long time ago -- had a special section for keyword placement in its messages. In the USENET newsgroups, the last four lines of a message were, by custom, allocated for whatever keywords or tagline that a user wanted to put in, outside of the original message. And what about today's blogs with their tags? Is properly tagging information on a blog, by the blog's author -- "SEO keyword stuffing" ? ? If I have violated any HN policy, then I apologize -- but your comment seems like a very arbitrary criticism. I could have phrased the same information in my original comment above as a statement, for example: "This Electric Motor called the Koenigsegg Quark which uses Raxial Flux which has 335 HP which weighs 63 Pounds which is Lighter Than A Tesla Motor -- is really pretty cool -- or at least it is in my opinion!" Would my phrasing of my original comment that way (exact same information -- probably the exact same value to search engines) -- have appeased you? ?
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]