5 ms·
>will be used as political ammunition for further wage laws based on personal characteristics/identity Like what? I don't really see what further laws Californ
by elil17 4y ago
>will be used as political ammunition for further wage laws based on personal characteristics/identity
Like what? I don't really see what further laws California could have within the current EEO framework. This seems targeted at transparency and enforcement.
- renlo 4y agoIn California they tried to add an amendment to allow race-based preferential treatment for the UCs (etc) [1]. It failed, but just putting this out there to better understand the milieu and how it _could_ be used. [1] https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16,_Repeal_Proposition_209_Affirmative_Action_Amendment_(2020) https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16,_Repeal_Pr...
- elil17 4y agoIn this case, "preferential treatment" means affirmative action, something that is done everywhere else in America. No one was proposing quotas or something like that, which are federally illegal.