3 ms·
So what you’re saying is we should pay $60,000 per year for government housing for these people? You know there have been studies where giving people homes, or
by TaylorAlexander 4y ago
So what you’re saying is we should pay $60,000 per year for government housing for these people?
You know there have been studies where giving people homes, or building subsidized housing, absolutely does improve peoples lives, cut addiction and crime rates, and generally do the things most progressives say they will.
Your proposal also puts them in expensive government housing but it does so in a way which significantly harms the individual. Incarceration might “solve” the problem for you but it does so at an extreme cost to others. And the financial burden to the state is still high. Meanwhile social housing solutions like those in Vienna actually make positive changes to peoples lives while still getting them off the streets:
https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_featd_article_011314.html https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_featd_articl...
Honestly it’s like you people think the police and prisons are free.
- twblalock 4y ago> Honestly it’s like you people think the police and prisons are free. No, I think those things cost money and are worth paying for. What did I write that made you think I thought they were free?
- TaylorAlexander 4y agoBecause you outright dismiss building social housing as expensive and ineffective but you want to put them in to an equally expensive situation that is clearly less effective. I cannot imagine why you would think prison is better than social housing unless you ignore the very real cost of prison.
- twblalock 4y agoPrison is social housing, but it’s mandatory rather than optional. We could build all the social housing we want, but it will only house people who willingly move into it. Many homeless people are insane drug addicts, and they are the ones who disrupt society, and they will not willingly change. What would you do about that?
- closeparen 4y agoSome people are going to need more intensive (and possibly coercive) care and supervision than social housing provides, but it is not like they're struggling to fill social housing units. Backlogs are deep and competitive. We need a lot more of them.
- TaylorAlexander 4y agoPrison abuses the soul and doesn’t help the individual. Look at the recidivism rates for US prisons to see how prison does nothing to rehabilitate people. If prison doesn’t help someone and you want to send them to prison, then you aren’t actually trying to help people you’re just trying to get rid of them. If you actually try to help people you will see how much better social housing is. But I don’t think that’s where your mind is at. You see these people as a lost cause and you want police to take them away. Don’t pretend you care if you actually just want them gone. “Many people are insane drug addicts” Lots of people in society are drug addicts. Probably the rate is slightly higher amongst the homeless because homelessness can be hard. Lots of people don’t want to go to existing shelters because of the draconian rules at those shelters. Probably you wouldn’t want to live in a place either if you had to be home every night at 8pm and you couldn’t have friends over and you weren’t allowed to have some beer. Does that mean we should throw you in prison? What I would do is provide the services these people need. Housing, mental health services, counseling, job training, and job placement programs. All told this would cost less than prison because these programs have been shown to actually help people, so the burden to the state will go down over a few years as these programs do what they are supposed to. But prison won’t help them, so the costs will continue for as long as they are in prison, and once they are released you’re back where you started. Don’t pretend you want to help people if you don’t actually care what is most effective at helping them.
- twblalock 4y ago> Don’t pretend you want to help people if you don’t actually care what is most effective at helping them. I want to help people. I just recognize reality. All of what you have suggested has been tried, and has failed, and now the streets of San Francisco are unrecognizably bad. Dystopian sci-fi movies from the 1980s are actually better than the reality on the streets today. Also, who are we trying to help? Personally I care more about the person living in an apartment who has to deal with crazy people stabbing each other outside of their window in the morning than I do about the crazy people stabbing each other. Not enough attention has been paid to the people who are trying to live upright lives while being surrounded by this violence -- going to work, raising children, etc. They matter too.