26 ms·
> be me > be anonymous writer > be fearful of AI de-anonymizing my contrarian self > idea > write only greentexts, like other millions > AI can't single me
by supermatou 4y ago
> be me
> be anonymous writer
> be fearful of AI de-anonymizing my contrarian self
> idea
> write only greentexts, like other millions
> AI can't single me out
> AI defeated
IFW
- throw10920 4y agoBeyond the meme, this seems to be a brilliant idea - just like how we have coding standards, why not make writing standards, several levels beyond what we have currently? Constrain the "syntax" of expression (the way you communicate, as opposed to the ideas you want to communicate) to counteract fingerprinting. Sure, you'd have to restrict your creativity and prose, but you'd get anonymity in return.
- omniglottal 4y agoAll natural languages have fundamental ambiguity built in. This increases "fitness" both for the languages and those using it. Precise disambiguation requires an ungodly amount of context which, notably, we don't all share between our distinct moral communities. This is a feature, not a bug. See (and practice) lojban if you intend to disambiguate. Next, just try to imagine prose or poetry or, hell, even a compelling speech or nuanced opinion...
- throw10920 4y agoI agree that disambiguation requires context and that this is a feature. Wouldn't that mean that you could write in a homogeneous, but still unambiguous, style by manually, laboriously, providing context longform, alongside your main text, written in the same homogenized style?
- stevewatson301 4y agoInstructions unclear, got a society whose language is Orwellian Newsspeak.
- throw10920 4y agoNot sure how this is relevant - I didn't say anything about tuning language to restrict thought or avoid anti-government sentiment...