I don't personally, but society (even liberal society) still has structural reasons to disincentivize this kind of behavior. Even as someone who doesn't think

I don't personally, but society (even liberal society) still has structural reasons to disincentivize this kind of behavior. Even as someone who doesn't think the government should tell you how to live, you can't pretend to be blind to the fact of why the government doesn't want to promulgate this kind of promiscuity / lack of family structure. It's ironic, given they think it's completely okay to explicitly target firearms companies who make devices and implements protected by the constitution - however cry wolf when acts that may cause far more psychological or societal harm are also given a scarlet letter. To be clear, even as someone far-left leaning I'd acknowledge pornography, more specifically sexually driven parasocial relationships (onlyfans) as far more integral to incels and anti-social males than firearms. Sex work is commonly targeting at arms-length as "sex trafficking" - many sex workers commonly complain of this law enforcement "trope". However, the bright line of what is/isn't sexually predatory or supporting aspects of pedophillia are becoming more gray with sites like onlyfans. For instance, do we really want young women to only see immediate value in exposing their bodies on the internet for $5 a mo? (Ironically, less money than you'd donate to a charity to feed a child in africa) Just my 2c.