Your scheme would apply for any sort of licensing, permissive or not, and is certainly not constrained to using creative commons. It's also flawed in the same,

Your scheme would apply for any sort of licensing, permissive or not, and is certainly not constrained to using creative commons. It's also flawed in the same, albeit weak, manner: the source it was stolen from predates the stolen copies, and so can show its true provenance. Of course, if it wasn't published or otherwise registered, no one would know.