3 ms·
This is what a lot of people miss when they talk about moving to/from cloud providers. The marginal cost to add X more servers in the cloud is basically nothing
by brodouevencode 4y ago
This is what a lot of people miss when they talk about moving to/from cloud providers. The marginal cost to add X more servers in the cloud is basically nothing, whereas to set up a new rack for on-prem requires requirements gathering, purchase orders, finance approvals, someone being at the dock when the UPS truck arrives, rack and stacks, etc. Those are one-time, yet very real costs. These fall under cap-ex which accounting-wise is treated very differently than op-ex. Now the cost in the cloud bakes all that in, and is distributed around with other users of the provider. Your accounting models are also easier ("pay for what you use").
Couple that with the very well known fact that AWS has outrageous data egress charges and there are patterns that can emerge where you're still in cloud but not racking up massive outbound data charges.
- fabian2k 4y agoYou can rent servers if you don't want to bother with this. The choice is not only between doing everything yourself and the cloud, there are a lot of options in between.
- brodouevencode 4y agoYes - that's a very fair point. It should still be calculated in the cost, and I don't think the article does a very good job of identifying the tradeoffs to OPs point.