4 ms·
I think nano services follow the "Unix Philosophy". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy It would be co
by jmartrican 4y ago
I think nano services follow the "Unix Philosophy". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy
It would be cool if it were possible to pipe the output of one these services into the input of another. Like how pipes work in Unix.
- asim 4y agoI would love to be able to do that as well. I always thought this would be some sort of service composition or batch query model. Both Micro and M3O have CLI tools which can enable that so technically you can do something like that but natively would be WAY better.
- acjohnson55 4y agoMy friend created something like this at kodou.io.
- tiagod 4y agoI built something like this using rabbitmq for automating delivery of online documents (taxes) for an accounting company. I had a queue per function, a DAG defining the workflow, and the tasks themselves would know who to forward the result to. Different libraries of tasks ran in different environments with different permissions (filesystem access ran on a windows server, for example, to access the file shares), only browsers had Internet access (and only to certain domains). I eventually switched to a code monolith running in a segmented way with temporal.io, where I have libraries of activities which run in different nodes. You might be interested in their product.