I did read the article, and I didn’t think that one sentence in the entire story really constituted digging into the idea of intentionally closing down several

I did read the article, and I didn’t think that one sentence in the entire story really constituted digging into the idea of intentionally closing down several small towns and combined them into a new intentionally fire-resistant settlement, nor why that idea would be resisted by the people in the towns. Your comment is rude, and against HN guidelines.