2 ms·
> Russia: Basically none. They blew up their own pipelines. They did it in sovereign territory, one of which is a NATO member. So, no, there is not "Basically
by rendall 4y ago
> Russia: Basically none. They blew up their own pipelines.
They did it in sovereign territory, one of which is a NATO member. So, no, there is not "Basically no consequence". There is a very real likelihood that a NATO member will invoke Article 5.
Not only that, the direct consequences are dire for Russia at a time when they desperately need leverage over Europe. Now they have none.
No. 4D chess and contorted motivations.
> USA: Massive
Agreed. I don't consider the US a likely suspect.
- Paradigma11 4y agoRussia used nerve agents and radioactive substances on NATO soil to kill people. These are the specialists they used: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7248461/salisbury-poisoning-suspects-skripal-alexander-petrov-ruslan-boshirov/ https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7248461/salisbury-poisoning-su... Russia blew up weapons depots in Bulgaria and Czechia, killing two people. You really think that they would not blow up their own pipeline in the EEZ of a NATO country?