3 ms·
None of that is relevant. My point is that if you accept a time and materials contract with an expected working day clause then it’s unethical to double book t
by benjaminwootton 4y ago
None of that is relevant. My point is that if you accept a time and materials contract with an expected working day clause then it’s unethical to double book time and in no way a reflection on the employer or hirer.
- boltzmann-brain 4y agoOh but on the contrary, it's extremely relevant. The fact that it's uncomfortable to your agenda that the basis of your "time and materials contract" is immoral and unethical doesn't make it less relevant - in fact, it makes it exactly the most relevant thing to say about this. You have an unethical contract meant to remove people's safety and wealth and based off of that piece of paper you expect people to be ethical about it. Come on dude, you can't be this self-contradictory.