4 ms·
It is a huge flaw since it is notoriously opaque and leans towards public company shareholders. Another easy example is that they completely miss the mind-bogg
by tenpies 4y ago
It is a huge flaw since it is notoriously opaque and leans towards public company shareholders.
Another easy example is that they completely miss the mind-boggingly wealthy like Queen Elizabeth II who was at the time the largest land owner on the planet and her wealth would lap everyone on that list. She was also a woman so they wouldn't get to complain about sexism in wealth distributions nearly as much.