That's not entirely fair. I've been reading her blog for a long time. She's basically opposed to maths in physics for the sake of beautiful maths (nature does

That's not entirely fair. I've been reading her blog for a long time. She's basically opposed to maths in physics for the sake of beautiful maths (nature doesn't have to be beautiful in our eyes), and spending vast amounts on money on bigger particle accelerators when there is no particular theory to test. She wants to see real progress in her field. This doesn't necessarily make her right, but she has valid viewpoints that somewhat threaten the status quo of particle physics.