3 ms·
Because it would be a direct attack on NATO.
by AndrewThrowaway 4y ago
Because it would be a direct attack on NATO.
- rendall 4y agoThe Nord Stream sabotage is not? You know some of the explosions happened on NATO territory, right?
- AndrewThrowaway 4y agoNord Stream is 51% Russian (Gazprom). Not sure if it is NATO territory or international waters. It still becomes a little bit more "muddy" on who could have made it and who benefits from it. Attacking Norway-Poland line at this point would be a very obvious and very direct attack on NATO.
- rendall 4y agoThis is all motivated thinking with "It's Russia!" as the end goal. Some of the NS attacks were on NATO territory. Denmark could invoke Article 5 were it found to be Russia. If "NATO" were in the equation, the saboteurs would have stayed in Swedish and Finnish waters, and even then it's iffy.
- Paradigma11 4y agoRussia has already used radioactive poisons and nerve agents on NATO territory, so that little explosion is nothing.