4 ms·
For anyone shocked by this (as I am) it's interesting to reflect on what about physical objects makes us value them so much. I'm of the opinion that it's better
by pcthrowaway 4y ago
For anyone shocked by this (as I am) it's interesting to reflect on what about physical objects makes us value them so much. I'm of the opinion that it's better to digitize most things (I prefer digital books and documents over physical copies for example), but burning a one-of-a-kind artwork from a historical figure is painful to read about.
At the same time, something new has been created. The value of anything is really subjective, and surely people are going to consider these NFTs valuable for intangible reasons, much like the rest of art.
It's surprising he didn't donate the painting to charity directly though, as that would probably reduce his tax burden.
- uup 4y agoThe history the object is what makes it interesting. A perfect replica of the painting will never have been touched by Frida Khalo, nor will a digital copy of her work. Books and documents are mostly fungible. No one cares about the history or most books and documents.