4 ms·
The strategic value to the US is that it completely removes the possibility that Germany will negotiate with Russia to turn the pipelines back on. Or, alternat
by throwawaydad12 4y ago
The strategic value to the US is that it completely removes the possibility that Germany will negotiate with Russia to turn the pipelines back on.
Or, alternatively, it's a strategic benefit to Russia to plant the idea of US treachery in the minds of the Germans.
I have no opinion and doubt we'll ever know what actually happened. Definitely sabotage, though.
- woodruffw 4y agoI don’t have a stated opinion on the strategic value, so I’m not sure what that’s a response to. My opinion was solely that quote is weak evidence.
- hackerlight 4y agoReally, either speculation is equally valid (or should I say, invalid) without: (1) An understanding of the facts of how successful the EU has been at diversifying away from Russian gas and whether NS2's natural demise was all but an inevitability. (2) How much the repairs will cost. If the repair costs are low, it's probably Russia, because of the propaganda value. If NS2's demise was highly likely, again probably Russia because they're leveraging a sunk cost to their benefit which is just smart. But so many people are making confident assumptions about (1) and (2) in this thread. If you don't know the answer to those questions, stop forming strong opinions!