>46. Deeper research into P v NP will result in a far deeper and clearer understanding of exactly what is and is not possible in machine learning, and the natur

>46. Deeper research into P v NP will result in a far deeper and clearer understanding of exactly what is and is not possible in machine learning, and the nature of intelligence itself. This seems like one of the most far fetched and least informed predictions on the list. I am exceedingly confident that P v NP research will not have relevance in the philosophical field of understanding the nature of intelligence. Additionally, I am not aware how "machine learning" would intersect with P v NP research.