If there is substantial interest in the paper after it has been published, it would be a lot easier to verify with the raw data than without. Nothing about the

If there is substantial interest in the paper after it has been published, it would be a lot easier to verify with the raw data than without. Nothing about the peer review process necessarily needs change beyond immediately rejecting all papers that do not include the minimum amount of data to validate their claims (even if said data is simply stored and not immediately reviewed).