I think you're misunderstanding the discussion. We're not saying that this was ecoterrorism. We're just pointing out that "it's bad for the environment" isn't

I think you're misunderstanding the discussion. We're not saying that this was ecoterrorism. We're just pointing out that "it's bad for the environment" isn't an argument wherever this was done by eco terrorists. It remains unlikely, mainly for the original point given. Regardless wherever it's bad for the environment or not, they would've claimed responsibility by now.