Isn't the dramatic discursive style abundantly supported by the acuteness of the problem, and the various non-climate related advantages accrued from the method

Isn't the dramatic discursive style abundantly supported by the acuteness of the problem, and the various non-climate related advantages accrued from the methods used to mitigate it? The fact that annoying/religious-oriented people exist does not diminish that aspect. Let's say we give additional attention to people who complain about being shut down. I don't want to be too cynical, but the response is likely to be along the lines of not being interested in the various mitigation strategies. There might be quality arguments but the conclusion will largely be inaction or just devil's avocation for its own sake. If we move away from the "called deniers and shut down" or complaints about free speech part there's often not actually a lot of material left. Which is why the answer is sometimes to simply not have the conversation.